(1) The state department shall promulgate rules for an administrative review process.
All decisions of the state department shall be binding upon the county departmentinvolved and shall be complied with by such county department.
If a participant does not agree with or fails to participate in a program or serviceidentified in the IRC, the participant shall continue to receive the basic cash assistance grant that the participant received at the time the appeal is requested during the pendency of any appeal process.
An applicant or participant who believes the IRC proposed by the county is unreasonable has a right to request a review of the proposed IRC by the county department pursuant to a process designated by the county in its written county policy. If the applicant or participant requests such review, the county shall provide the applicant or participant the opportunity for a county level review by a person not directly involved in the initial determination. The review shall be limited to determining whether the terms of the disputed IRC are reasonable within the context of the county's written policy. The reviewer shall issue a written decision for the county regarding the resolution of the outstanding issues involving the proposed IRC. The time frame for such review shall be specified by the county in its written county policy.
Source: L. 97: Entire part added, p. 1203, § 1, effective June 3. L. 99: Entire section amended, p. 659, § 2, effective May 18.