(1) The general assembly finds that:
There exists a widespread inconsistency among jurisdictions within the state withregard to the issuance of permits to carry concealed handguns and identification of areas of the state where it is lawful to carry concealed handguns;
This inconsistency among jurisdictions creates public uncertainty regarding the areasof the state in which it is lawful to carry concealed handguns;
Inconsistency results in the arbitrary and capricious denial of permits to carry concealed handguns based on the jurisdiction of residence rather than the qualifications for obtaining a permit;
The criteria and procedures for the lawful carrying of concealed handguns historically has been regulated by state statute and should be consistent throughout the state to ensure the consistent implementation of state law; and
It is necessary that the state occupy the field of regulation of the bearing of concealedhandguns since the issuance of a concealed handgun permit is based on a person's constitutional right of self-protection and there is a prevailing state interest in ensuring that no citizen is arbitrarily denied a concealed handgun permit and in ensuring that the laws controlling the use of the permit are consistent throughout the state.
(2) Based on the findings specified in subsection (1) of this section, the general assembly hereby concludes that:
The permitting and carrying of concealed handguns is a matter of statewide concern;and
It is necessary to provide statewide uniform standards for issuing permits to carryconcealed handguns for self-defense.
(3) In accordance with the findings and conclusions specified in subsections (1) and (2) of this section, the general assembly hereby instructs each sheriff to implement and administer the provisions of this part 2. The general assembly does not delegate to the sheriffs the authority to regulate or restrict the issuance of permits provided for in this part 2 beyond the provisions of this part 2. An action or rule that encumbers the permit process by placing burdens on the applicant beyond those sworn statements and specified documents detailed in this part 2 or that creates restrictions beyond those specified in this part 2 is in conflict with the intent of this part 2 and is prohibited.
Source: L. 2003: Entire part added, p. 635, § 1, effective May 17.