Immunity from liability - prohibited activity.

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

(1) A cause of action does not arise, and liability shall not be imposed, against the commissioner, the commissioner's authorized representatives, or any market conduct surveillance personnel employed or appointed by the commissioner for any statements made or conduct performed in good faith while carrying out the provisions of this part 3.

  1. A cause of action does not arise, and liability shall not be imposed, against any person for communicating or delivering information or data to the commissioner, the commissioner's authorized representative, or any market conduct surveillance personnel pursuant to a market conduct surveillance performed under this part 3, if the communication or delivery was performed in good faith and without fraudulent intent or the intent to deceive.

  2. This section does not abrogate or modify any common-law or statutory privilege orimmunity enjoyed by any person identified in subsection (1) of this section.

  3. A person identified in subsection (1) of this section is entitled to an award of attorneyfees and costs if the person is the prevailing party in a civil action for libel, slander, or any other relevant tort arising out of activities in carrying out the provisions of this part 3, and the party bringing the action was not substantially justified in bringing the action. For purposes of this section, a proceeding is "substantially justified" if it had a reasonable basis in law or fact at the time that it was initiated.

  4. (a) A company shall not take any retaliatory personnel action against an employee because the employee provides information pursuant to any type of market conduct surveillance examining the practices of the company.

  1. An employee who has been the subject of a retaliatory personnel action in violationof subsection (5)(a) of this section may institute a civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction for relief within one year after learning of the alleged retaliatory action.

  2. A court of competent jurisdiction may order relief as follows:

  1. Reinstatement of the employee to the same position held before the retaliatory personnel action or to an equivalent position;

  2. Reinstatement of full benefits and seniority rights; and(III) Compensation for lost wages and benefits.

(d) Upon a determination that a company has taken a retaliatory personnel action, the court may award costs of the action together with reasonable attorney fees.

Source: L. 2017: Entire part added, (HB 17-1231), ch. 284, p. 1570, § 10, effective January 1, 2018.


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.