Section 96.21.

Checkout our iOS App for a better way to browser and research.

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, in the County of Solano, the apportionment of property tax revenues made pursuant to Section 96.2 or its predecessor section, for the 1987–88 fiscal year only, shall be modified as follows:

(1) The auditor shall increase by the sum of two hundred sixty-three thousand dollars ($263,000) the total amount of property tax revenues apportioned to the City of Suisun.

(2) The auditor shall reduce by the sum of ninety thousand dollars ($90,000) the total amount of property tax revenue apportioned to the Solano County General Fund.

(3) The auditor shall reduce by the total sum of one hundred seventy-three thousand dollars ($173,000) the total amount of property tax revenue apportioned to all of the following: the Solano County Free Library; the Greater Vallejo Recreation District; the Solano County Water Conservation District; the Solano County Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund; the Solano County Aviation; the Solano County Recreation; the Solano County Zone of Benefit 1; the Solano County Library Special Tax Zone 1; the Fairfield-Suisun Cemetery District; the Solano County portion of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District; and the Cities of Benicia, Dixon, Fairfield, Vacaville, Rio Vista, and Vallejo. The reduction required by this paragraph shall be made by the auditor by computing that percentage of the total amount of property tax revenue allocated to all of the jurisdictions and funds specified in this paragraph which equals one hundred seventy-three thousand dollars ($173,000) and by reducing the total amount of property tax revenue allocated to each of those jurisdictions and funds by that percentage.

(b) For the 1988–89 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, the auditor shall increase the total amount of property tax revenue apportioned to the City of Suisun pursuant to Section 96.2 by the same percentage by which the total amount of property tax revenue to be apportioned to the city pursuant to Section 96.2 in the 1987–88 fiscal year was increased by the application of subdivision (a).

(c) For the 1988–89 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, the auditor shall reduce the total amount of property tax revenue apportioned to each jurisdiction and fund specified in paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (a) as follows:

(1) The auditor shall compute for each jurisdiction and fund that percentage of the total amount of the property tax revenue reduction required by subdivision (a) for the 1987–88 fiscal year which is equal to the total amount of its property tax revenue reduction for that fiscal year.

(2) The auditor shall reduce the total amount of the property tax revenue apportioned to each jurisdiction and fund for the applicable fiscal year by the amount determined by multiplying the percentage computed for the jurisdiction or fund in paragraph (1) by the total amount of the increase computed in subdivision (b).

(Added by Stats. 1994, Ch. 1167, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 1995.)


Download our app to see the most-to-date content.